• The keystone of the framework's "key user adds fields without code"
    promise. A YAML declaration is now enough to add a typed custom field
    to an existing entity, validate it on every save, and surface it to
    the SPA / OpenAPI / AI agent. This is the bit that makes vibe_erp a
    *framework* instead of a fork-per-customer app.
    
    What landed
    -----------
    * Extended `MetadataYamlFile` with a top-level `customFields:` section
      and `CustomFieldYaml` + `CustomFieldTypeYaml` wire-format DTOs. The
      YAML uses a flat `kind: decimal / scale: 2` discriminator instead of
      Jackson polymorphic deserialization so plug-in authors don't have to
      nest type configs and api.v1's `FieldType` stays free of Jackson
      imports.
    * `MetadataLoader.doLoad` now upserts `metadata__custom_field` rows
      alongside entities/permissions/menus, with the same delete-by-source
      idempotency. `LoadResult` carries the count for the boot log.
    * `CustomFieldRegistry` reads every `metadata__custom_field` row from
      the database and builds an in-memory `Map<entityName, List<CustomField>>`
      for the validator's hot path. `refresh()` is called by
      `VibeErpPluginManager` after the initial core load AND after every
      plug-in load, so a freshly-installed plug-in's custom fields are
      immediately enforceable. ConcurrentHashMap under the hood; reads
      are lock-free.
    * `ExtJsonValidator` is the on-save half: takes (entityName, ext map),
      walks the declared fields, coerces each value to its native type,
      and returns the canonicalised map (or throws IllegalArgumentException
      with ALL violations joined for a single 400). Per-FieldType rules:
      - String: maxLength enforced.
      - Integer: accepts Number and numeric String, rejects garbage.
      - Decimal: precision/scale enforced; preserved as plain string in
        canonical form so JSON encoding doesn't lose trailing zeros.
      - Boolean: accepts true/false (case-insensitive).
      - Date / DateTime: ISO-8601 parse via java.time.
      - Uuid: java.util.UUID parse.
      - Enum: must be in declared `allowedValues`.
      - Money / Quantity / Json / Reference: pass-through (Reference target
        existence check pending the cross-PBC EntityRegistry seam).
      Unknown ext keys are rejected with the entity's name and the keys
      themselves listed. ALL violations are returned in one response, not
      failing on the first, so a form submitter fixes everything in one
      round-trip.
    * `Partner` is the first PBC entity to wire ext through the validator:
      `CreatePartnerRequest` and `UpdatePartnerRequest` accept an
      `ext: Map<String, Any?>?`; `PartnerService.create/update` calls
      `extValidator.validate("Partner", ext)` and persists the canonical
      JSON to the existing `partners__partner.ext` JSONB column;
      `PartnerResponse` parses it back so callers see what they wrote.
    * `partners.yml` now declares two custom fields on Partner —
      `partners_credit_limit` (Decimal precision=14, scale=2) and
      `partners_industry` (Enum of printing/publishing/packaging/other) —
      with English and Chinese labels. Tagged `source=core` so the
      framework has something to demo from a fresh boot.
    * New public `GET /api/v1/_meta/metadata/custom-fields/{entityName}`
      endpoint serves the api.v1 runtime view of declarations from the
      in-memory registry (so it reflects every refresh) for the SPA's form
      builder, the OpenAPI generator, and the AI agent function catalog.
      The existing `GET /api/v1/_meta/metadata` endpoint also gained a
      `customFields` list.
    
    End-to-end smoke test
    ---------------------
    Reset Postgres, booted the app, verified:
    * Boot log: `CustomFieldRegistry: refreshed 2 custom fields across 1
      entities (0 malformed rows skipped)` — twice (after core load and
      after plug-in load).
    * `GET /api/v1/_meta/metadata/custom-fields/Partner` → both declarations
      with their labels.
    * `POST /api/v1/partners/partners` with `ext = {credit_limit: "50000.00",
      industry: "printing"}` → 201; the response echoes the canonical map.
    * `POST` with `ext = {credit_limit: "1.234", industry: "unicycles",
      rogue: "x"}` → 400 with all THREE violations in one body:
      "ext contains undeclared key(s) for 'Partner': [rogue]; ext.partners_credit_limit:
      decimal scale 3 exceeds declared scale 2; ext.partners_industry:
      value 'unicycles' is not in allowed set [printing, publishing,
      packaging, other]".
    * `SELECT ext FROM partners__partner WHERE code = 'CUST-EXT-OK'` →
      `{"partners_industry": "printing", "partners_credit_limit": "50000.00"}`
      — the canonical JSON is in the JSONB column verbatim.
    * Regression: catalog uoms, identity users, partners list, and the
      printing-shop plug-in's POST /plates (with i18n via Accept-Language:
      zh-CN) all still HTTP 2xx.
    
    Build
    -----
    * `./gradlew build`: 13 subprojects, 129 unit tests (was 118), all
      green. The 11 new tests cover each FieldType variant, multi-violation
      reporting, required missing rejection, unknown key rejection, and the
      null-value-dropped case.
    
    What was deferred
    -----------------
    * JPA listener auto-validation. Right now PartnerService explicitly
      calls extValidator.validate(...) before save; Item, Uom, User and
      the plug-in tables don't yet. Promoting the validator to a JPA
      PrePersist/PreUpdate listener attached to a marker interface
      HasExt is the right next step but is its own focused chunk.
    * Reference target existence check. FieldType.Reference passes
      through unchanged because the cross-PBC EntityRegistry that would
      let the validator look up "does an instance with this id exist?"
      is a separate seam landing later.
    * The customization UI (Tier 1 self-service add a field via the SPA)
      is P3.3 — the runtime enforcement is done, the editor is not.
    * Custom-field-aware permissions. The `pii: true` flag is in the
      metadata but not yet read by anything; the DSAR/erasure pipeline
      that will consume it is post-v1.0.
    zichun authored
     
    Browse Code »
  • The third real PBC. Validates the modular-monolith template against a
    parent-with-children aggregate (Partner → Addresses → Contacts), where
    the previous two PBCs only had single-table or two-independent-table
    shapes.
    
    What landed
    -----------
    * New Gradle subproject `pbc/pbc-partners` (12 modules total now).
    * Three JPA entities, all extending `AuditedJpaEntity`:
      - `Partner` — code, name, type (CUSTOMER/SUPPLIER/BOTH), tax_id,
        website, email, phone, active, ext jsonb. Single-table for both
        customers and suppliers because the role flag is a property of
        the relationship, not the organisation.
      - `Address` — partner_id FK, address_type (BILLING/SHIPPING/OTHER),
        line1/line2/city/region/postal_code/country_code (ISO 3166-1),
        is_primary. Two free address lines + structured city/region/code
        is the smallest set that round-trips through every postal system.
      - `Contact` — partner_id FK, full_name, role, email, phone, active.
        PII-tagged in metadata YAML for the future audit/export tooling.
    * Spring Data JPA repos, application services with full CRUD and the
      invariants below, REST controllers under
      `/api/v1/partners/partners` (+ nested addresses, contacts).
    * `partners-init.xml` Liquibase changelog with the three tables, FKs,
      GIN index on `partner.ext`, indexes on type/active/country.
    * New api.v1 facade `org.vibeerp.api.v1.ext.partners` with
      `PartnersApi` + `PartnerRef`. Third `ext.<pbc>` after identity and
      catalog. Inactive partners hidden at the facade boundary.
    * `PartnersApiAdapter` runtime implementation in pbc-partners, never
      leaking JPA entity types.
    * `partners.yml` metadata declaring all 3 entities, 12 permission
      keys, 1 menu entry. Picked up automatically by `MetadataLoader`.
    * 15 new unit tests across `PartnerServiceTest`, `AddressServiceTest`
      and `ContactServiceTest` (mockk-based, mirroring catalog tests).
    
    Invariants enforced in code (not blindly delegated to the DB)
    -------------------------------------------------------------
    * Partner code uniqueness — explicit check produces a 400 with a real
      message instead of a 500 from the unique-index violation.
    * Partner code is NOT updatable — every external reference uses code,
      so renaming is a data-migration concern, not an API call.
    * Partner deactivate cascades to contacts (also flipped to inactive).
      Addresses are NOT touched (no `active` column — they exist or they
      don't). Verified end-to-end against Postgres.
    * "Primary" flag is at most one per (partner, address_type). When a
      new/updated address is marked primary, all OTHER primaries of the
      same type for the same partner are demoted in the same transaction.
    * Addresses and contacts reject operations on unknown partners
      up-front to give better errors than the FK-violation.
    
    End-to-end smoke test
    ---------------------
    Reset Postgres, booted the app, hit:
    * POST /api/v1/auth/login (admin) → JWT
    * POST /api/v1/partners/partners (CUSTOMER, SUPPLIER) → 201
    * GET  /api/v1/partners/partners → lists both
    * GET  /api/v1/partners/partners/by-code/CUST-ACME → resolves
    * POST /api/v1/partners/partners (dup code) → 400 with real message
    * POST .../{id}/addresses (BILLING, primary) → 201
    * POST .../{id}/contacts → 201
    * DELETE /api/v1/partners/partners/{id} → 204; partner active=false
    * GET  .../contacts → contact ALSO active=false (cascade verified)
    * GET  /api/v1/_meta/metadata/entities → 3 partners entities present
    * GET  /api/v1/_meta/metadata/permissions → 12 partners permissions
    * Regression: catalog UoMs/items, identity users, printing-shop
      plug-in plates all still HTTP 200.
    
    Build
    -----
    * `./gradlew build`: 12 subprojects, 107 unit tests, all green
      (was 11 / 92 before this commit).
    * The architectural rule still enforced: pbc-partners depends on
      api-v1 + platform-persistence + platform-security only — no
      cross-PBC dep, no platform-bootstrap dep.
    
    What was deferred
    -----------------
    * Permission enforcement on contact endpoints (P4.3). Currently plain
      authenticated; the metadata declares the planned `partners.contact.*`
      keys for when @RequirePermission lands.
    * Per-country address structure layered on top via metadata forms
      (P3.x). The current schema is the smallest universal subset.
    * `deletePartnerCompletely` — out of scope for v1; should be a
      separate "data scrub" admin tool, not a routine API call.
    zichun authored
     
    Browse Code »