朱子纯 / vibe-erp

The framework's eighth PBC and the first one that's NOT order- or
master-data-shaped. Work orders are about *making things*, which is
the reason the printing-shop reference customer exists in the first
place. With this PBC in place the framework can express the full
buy-sell-make loop end-to-end.

What landed (new module pbc/pbc-production/)
  - WorkOrder entity (production__work_order):
      code, output_item_code, output_quantity, status (DRAFT|COMPLETED|
      CANCELLED), due_date (display-only), source_sales_order_code
      (nullable — work orders can be either auto-spawned from a
      confirmed SO or created manually), ext.
  - WorkOrderJpaRepository with existsBySourceSalesOrderCode /
    findBySourceSalesOrderCode for the auto-spawn dedup.
  - WorkOrderService.create / complete / cancel:
      • create validates the output item via CatalogApi (same seam
        SalesOrderService and PurchaseOrderService use), rejects
        non-positive quantities, publishes WorkOrderCreatedEvent.
      • complete(outputLocationCode) credits finished goods to the
        named location via InventoryApi.recordMovement with
        reason=PRODUCTION_RECEIPT (added in commit c52d0d59) and
        reference="WO:<order_code>", then flips status to COMPLETED,
        then publishes WorkOrderCompletedEvent — all in the same
        @Transactional method.
      • cancel only allowed from DRAFT (no un-producing finished
        goods); publishes WorkOrderCancelledEvent.
  - SalesOrderConfirmedSubscriber (@PostConstruct →
    EventBus.subscribe(SalesOrderConfirmedEvent::class.java, ...)):
    walks the confirmed sales order's lines via SalesOrdersApi
    (NOT by importing pbc-orders-sales) and calls
    WorkOrderService.create for each line. Coded as one bean with
    one subscription — matches pbc-finance's one-bean-per-subject
    pattern.
      • Idempotent on source sales order code — if any work order
        already exists for the SO, the whole spawn is a no-op.
      • Tolerant of a missing SO (defensive against a future async
        bus that could deliver the confirm event after the SO has
        vanished).
      • The WO code convention: WO-FROM-<so_code>-L<lineno>, e.g.
        WO-FROM-SO-2026-0001-L1.

  - REST controller /api/v1/production/work-orders: list, get,
    by-code, create, complete, cancel — each annotated with
    @RequirePermission. Four permission keys declared in the
    production.yml metadata: read / create / complete / cancel.
  - CompleteWorkOrderRequest: single-arg DTO uses the
    @JsonCreator(mode=PROPERTIES) + @param:JsonProperty trick that
    already bit ShipSalesOrderRequest and ReceivePurchaseOrderRequest;
    cross-referenced in the KDoc so the third instance doesn't need
    re-discovery.
  - distribution/.../pbc-production/001-production-init.xml:
    CREATE TABLE with CHECK on status + CHECK on qty>0 + GIN on ext
    + the usual indexes. NEITHER output_item_code NOR
    source_sales_order_code is a foreign key (cross-PBC reference
    policy — guardrail #9).
  - settings.gradle.kts + distribution/build.gradle.kts: registers
    the new module and adds it to the distribution dependency list.
  - master.xml: includes the new changelog in dependency order,
    after pbc-finance.

New api.v1 surface: org.vibeerp.api.v1.event.production.*
  - WorkOrderCreatedEvent, WorkOrderCompletedEvent,
    WorkOrderCancelledEvent — sealed under WorkOrderEvent,
    aggregateType="production.WorkOrder". Same pattern as the
    order events, so any future consumer (finance revenue
    recognition, warehouse put-away dashboard, a customer plug-in
    that needs to react to "work finished") subscribes through the
    public typed-class overload with no dependency on pbc-production.

Unit tests (13 new, 217 → 230 total)
  - WorkOrderServiceTest (9 tests): create dedup, positive quantity
    check, catalog seam, happy-path create with event assertion,
    complete rejects non-DRAFT, complete happy path with
    InventoryApi.recordMovement assertion + event assertion, cancel
    from DRAFT, cancel rejects COMPLETED.
  - SalesOrderConfirmedSubscriberTest (5 tests): subscription
    registration count, spawns N work orders for N SO lines with
    correct code convention, idempotent when WOs already exist,
    no-op on missing SO, and a listener-routing test that captures
    the EventListener instance and verifies it forwards to the
    right service method.

End-to-end smoke verified against real Postgres
  - Fresh DB, fresh boot. Both OrderEventSubscribers (pbc-finance)
    and SalesOrderConfirmedSubscriber (pbc-production) log their
    subscription registration before the first HTTP call.
  - Seeded two items (BROCHURE-A, BROCHURE-B), a customer, and a
    finished-goods location (WH-FG).
  - Created a 2-line sales order (SO-WO-1), confirmed it.
      → Produced ONE orders_sales.SalesOrder outbox row.
      → Produced ONE AR POSTED finance__journal_entry for 1000 USD
        (500 × 1 + 250 × 2 — the pbc-finance consumer still works).
      → Produced TWO draft work orders auto-spawned from the SO
        lines: WO-FROM-SO-WO-1-L1 (BROCHURE-A × 500) and
        WO-FROM-SO-WO-1-L2 (BROCHURE-B × 250), both with
        source_sales_order_code=SO-WO-1.
  - Completed WO1 to WH-FG:
      → Produced a PRODUCTION_RECEIPT ledger row for BROCHURE-A
        delta=500 reference="WO:WO-FROM-SO-WO-1-L1".
      → inventory__stock_balance now has BROCHURE-A = 500 at WH-FG.
      → Flipped status to COMPLETED.
  - Cancelled WO2 → CANCELLED.
  - Created a manual WO-MANUAL-1 with no source SO → succeeds;
    demonstrates the "operator creates a WO to build inventory
    ahead of demand" path.
  - platform__event_outbox ends with 6 rows all DISPATCHED:
      orders_sales.SalesOrder SO-WO-1
      production.WorkOrder WO-FROM-SO-WO-1-L1  (created)
      production.WorkOrder WO-FROM-SO-WO-1-L2  (created)
      production.WorkOrder WO-FROM-SO-WO-1-L1  (completed)
      production.WorkOrder WO-FROM-SO-WO-1-L2  (cancelled)
      production.WorkOrder WO-MANUAL-1         (created)

Why this chunk was the right next move
  - pbc-finance was a PASSIVE consumer — it only wrote derived
    reporting state. pbc-production is the first ACTIVE consumer:
    it creates new aggregates with their own state machines and
    their own cross-PBC writes in reaction to another PBC's events.
    This is a meaningfully harder test of the event-driven
    integration story and it passes end-to-end.
  - "One ledger, three callers" is now real: sales shipments,
    purchase receipts, AND production receipts all feed the same
    inventory__stock_movement ledger through the same
    InventoryApi.recordMovement facade. The facade has proven
    stable under three very different callers.
  - The framework now expresses the basic ERP trinity: buy
    (purchase orders), sell (sales orders), make (work orders).
    That's the shape every real manufacturing customer needs, and
    it's done without any PBC importing another.

What's deliberately NOT in v1
  - No bill of materials. complete() only credits finished goods;
    it does NOT issue raw materials. A shop floor that needs to
    consume 4 sheets of paper to produce 1 brochure does it
    manually via POST /api/v1/inventory/movements with reason=
    MATERIAL_ISSUE (added in commit c52d0d59). A proper BOM lands
    as WorkOrderInput lines in a future chunk.
  - No IN_PROGRESS state. complete() goes DRAFT → COMPLETED in
    one step. A real shop floor needs "started but not finished"
    visibility; that's the next iteration.
  - No routings, operations, machine assignments, or due-date
    enforcement. due_date is display-only.
  - No "scrap defective output" flow for a COMPLETED work order.
    cancel refuses from COMPLETED; the fix requires a new
    MovementReason and a new event, not a special-case method
    on the service.