-
The buying-side mirror of pbc-orders-sales. Adds the 6th real PBC and closes the loop: the framework now does both directions of the inventory flow through the same `InventoryApi.recordMovement` facade. Buy stock with a PO that hits RECEIVED, ship stock with a SO that hits SHIPPED, both feed the same `inventory__stock_movement` ledger. What landed ----------- * New Gradle subproject `pbc/pbc-orders-purchase` (16 modules total now). Same dependency set as pbc-orders-sales, same architectural enforcement — no direct dependency on any other PBC; cross-PBC references go through `api.v1.ext.<pbc>` facades at runtime. * Two JPA entities mirroring SalesOrder / SalesOrderLine: - `PurchaseOrder` (header) — code, partner_code (varchar, NOT a UUID FK), status enum DRAFT/CONFIRMED/RECEIVED/CANCELLED, order_date, expected_date (nullable, the supplier's promised delivery date), currency_code, total_amount, ext jsonb. - `PurchaseOrderLine` — purchase_order_id FK, line_no, item_code, quantity, unit_price, currency_code. Same shape as the sales order line; the api.v1 facade reuses `SalesOrderLineRef` rather than declaring a duplicate type. * `PurchaseOrderService.create` performs three cross-PBC validations in one transaction: 1. PartnersApi.findPartnerByCode → reject if null. 2. The partner's `type` must be SUPPLIER or BOTH (a CUSTOMER-only partner cannot be the supplier of a purchase order — the mirror of the sales-order rule that rejects SUPPLIER-only partners as customers). 3. CatalogApi.findItemByCode for EVERY line. Then validates: at least one line, no duplicate line numbers, positive quantity, non-negative price, currency matches header. The header total is RECOMPUTED from the lines (caller's value ignored — never trust a financial aggregate sent over the wire). * State machine enforced by `confirm()`, `cancel()`, and `receive()`: - DRAFT → CONFIRMED (confirm) - DRAFT → CANCELLED (cancel) - CONFIRMED → CANCELLED (cancel before receipt) - CONFIRMED → RECEIVED (receive — increments inventory) - RECEIVED → × (terminal; cancellation requires a return-to-supplier flow) * `receive(id, receivingLocationCode)` walks every line and calls `inventoryApi.recordMovement(... +line.quantity reason="PURCHASE_RECEIPT" reference="PO:<order_code>")`. The whole operation runs in ONE transaction so a failure on any line rolls back EVERY line's already-written movement AND the order status change. The customer cannot end up with "5 of 7 lines received, status still CONFIRMED, ledger half-written". * New `POST /api/v1/orders/purchase-orders/{id}/receive` endpoint with body `{"receivingLocationCode": "WH-MAIN"}`, gated by `orders.purchase.receive`. The single-arg DTO has the same Jackson `@JsonCreator(mode = PROPERTIES)` workaround as `ShipSalesOrderRequest` (the trap is documented in the class KDoc with a back-reference to ShipSalesOrderRequest). * Confirm/cancel/receive endpoints carry `@RequirePermission` annotations (`orders.purchase.confirm`, `orders.purchase.cancel`, `orders.purchase.receive`). All three keys declared in the new `orders-purchase.yml` metadata. * New api.v1 facade `org.vibeerp.api.v1.ext.orders.PurchaseOrdersApi` + `PurchaseOrderRef`. Reuses the existing `SalesOrderLineRef` type for the line shape — buying and selling lines carry the same fields, so duplicating the ref type would be busywork. * `PurchaseOrdersApiAdapter` — sixth `*ApiAdapter` after Identity, Catalog, Partners, Inventory, SalesOrders. * `orders-purchase.yml` metadata declaring 2 entities, 6 permission keys, 1 menu entry under "Purchasing". End-to-end smoke test (the full demo loop) ------------------------------------------ Reset Postgres, booted the app, ran: * Login as admin * POST /catalog/items → PAPER-A4 * POST /partners → SUP-PAPER (SUPPLIER) * POST /inventory/locations → WH-MAIN * GET /inventory/balances?itemCode=PAPER-A4 → [] (no stock) * POST /orders/purchase-orders → PO-2026-0001 for 5000 sheets @ $0.04 = total $200.00 (recomputed from the line) * POST /purchase-orders/{id}/confirm → status CONFIRMED * POST /purchase-orders/{id}/receive body={"receivingLocationCode":"WH-MAIN"} → status RECEIVED * GET /inventory/balances?itemCode=PAPER-A4 → quantity=5000 * GET /inventory/movements?itemCode=PAPER-A4 → PURCHASE_RECEIPT delta=5000 ref=PO:PO-2026-0001 Then the FULL loop with the sales side from the previous chunk: * POST /partners → CUST-ACME (CUSTOMER) * POST /orders/sales-orders → SO-2026-0001 for 50 sheets * confirm + ship from WH-MAIN * GET /inventory/balances?itemCode=PAPER-A4 → quantity=4950 (5000-50) * GET /inventory/movements?itemCode=PAPER-A4 → PURCHASE_RECEIPT delta=5000 ref=PO:PO-2026-0001 SALES_SHIPMENT delta=-50 ref=SO:SO-2026-0001 The framework's `InventoryApi.recordMovement` facade now has TWO callers — pbc-orders-sales (negative deltas, SALES_SHIPMENT) and pbc-orders-purchase (positive deltas, PURCHASE_RECEIPT) — feeding the same ledger from both sides. Failure paths verified: * Re-receive a RECEIVED PO → 400 "only CONFIRMED orders can be received" * Cancel a RECEIVED PO → 400 "issue a return-to-supplier flow instead" * Create a PO from a CUSTOMER-only partner → 400 "partner 'CUST-ONLY' is type CUSTOMER and cannot be the supplier of a purchase order" Regression: catalog uoms, identity users, partners, inventory, sales orders, purchase orders, printing-shop plates with i18n, metadata entities (15 now, was 13) — all still HTTP 2xx. Build ----- * `./gradlew build`: 16 subprojects, 186 unit tests (was 175), all green. The 11 new tests cover the same shapes as the sales-order tests but inverted: unknown supplier, CUSTOMER-only rejection, BOTH-type acceptance, unknown item, empty lines, total recomputation, confirm/cancel state machine, receive-rejects-non-CONFIRMED, receive-walks-lines-with-positive- delta, cancel-rejects-RECEIVED, cancel-CONFIRMED-allowed. What was deferred ----------------- * **RFQs** (request for quotation) and **supplier price catalogs** — both lay alongside POs but neither is in v1. * **Partial receipts**. v1's RECEIVED is "all-or-nothing"; the supplier delivering 4500 of 5000 sheets is not yet modelled. * **Supplier returns / refunds**. The cancel-RECEIVED rejection message says "issue a return-to-supplier flow" — that flow doesn't exist yet. * **Three-way matching** (PO + receipt + invoice). Lands with pbc-finance. * **Multi-leg transfers**. TRANSFER_IN/TRANSFER_OUT exist in the movement enum but no service operation yet writes both legs in one transaction.